Researchers probe kidney damage, protection in lupus

From the FMS Global News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton (UK)

Courtesy utsouthwestern.edu

by Aline McKenzie – 214-648-3404 – aline.mckenzie@utsouthwestern.edu

DALLAS – April 21, 2009

UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers probe kidney damage, protection in lupus. Kidney damage associated with the autoimmune disease lupus is linked to a malfunction of immune cells that causes them to congregate in and attack the organs, researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center have discovered in a mouse study.

In a separate study with an international team, the researchers also found that a certain set of genes appears to protect the kidneys from a different sort of immune attack in both mice and humans.

“These studies, taken together, uncover two important molecules that underlie the pathology of lupus, particularly kidney disease,” said Dr. Edward Wakeland, chairman of immunology at UT Southwestern and co-senior author of the studies.

“In addition, they highlight a certain molecule as a potential target for treating this disease,” he said.

In the first study, which appears in the April issue of The Journal of Immunology, the researchers examined several strains of mice that mimic human lupus. They found that immune cells in those mice overproduced a particular molecule called CXCR4. In fact, the mice had up to twice as much CXCR4 as their normal counterparts in several types of immune cells. The lupus-prone mice also had more immune-system cells in their kidneys, indicating that the inflammatory action of the immune cells might be causing the kidney damage.

The CXCR4 molecule was already known to play a role in creating various types of blood cells and also has been shown to be active in cancer and AIDS. Cells with CXCR4 on their surface are attracted to another molecule released by cells in various organs, so they migrate toward those organs, including the kidney.

When the researchers treated the lupus mice with a substance that blocks CXCR4, the symptoms of lupus significantly diminished; many symptoms of kidney failure were averted; and the mice lived longer. The increased lifespan was greater when treatment began at an early age.

“This study indicates that drugs acting against CXCR4 might become useful therapies,” said Dr. Chandra Mohan, professor of internal medicine and co-senior author of the studies.

In the second study, published in the April issue of The Journal of Clinical Investigation, the researchers found that some members of a family of genes called kallikreins offered a degree of protection in both mice and humans against a type of kidney damage caused by a different mechanism.

For this mouse study, the researchers administered antibodies that attack a part of the kidney called the glomerular basement membrane, the portion of the organ that performs its main function of filtering wastes from blood. They then looked for genes that turned on or off in response to the antibody assault.

Nine forms of the kallikrein, or klk, gene became more active, resulting in a two- to sixfold increase in the proteins encoded by the genes in normal mouse strains, compared with lupus-prone strains. When some mice were given substances that block the action of kallikrein proteins, they showed more severe symptoms of lupus, suggesting that kallikreins protect against renal disease.

The researchers also studied 340 German patients with systemic lupus, matched with 400 healthy control subjects. The patients with lupus and kidney damage had klk genes that were different from those in the healthy patients. Similar findings were noted in a larger, more varied group of patients from Europe, the United States and Korea.

“All humans have Klk genes, but our findings show that some of us have a particular version that increases our risk for systemic lupus,” Dr. Wakeland said.

Future research will examine the mechanisms by which CXCR4 and klk genes might be aberrantly regulated in lupus and how they could be therapeutically targeted in human lupus, the researchers said.

Other UT Southwestern researchers involved in the first study were lead author and graduate student Andrew Wang; Dr. Anna-Marie Fairhurst, assistant instructor of immunology; Dr. Katalin Tus, instructor of immunology; former graduate student Srividya Subramanian; Dr. Yang Liu, postdoctoral researcher in internal medicine; Dr. Fangming Li, assistant professor of pediatrics; Dr. Peter Igarashi, professor of internal medicine; and Dr. Xin Zhou, professor of pathology. Researchers from the Université Paris-Descartes and Chemokine Therapeutics, Canada, also participated.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

Other UT Southwestern researchers involved in the second study were lead co-authors Dr. Kui Liu, instructor of internal medicine, and Dr. Quan-Zhen Li, assistant professor of immunology; Li Li, research associate in internal medicine; Jinchun Zhou, research scientist in immunology; Mei Yan, research associate in internal medicine; Dr. Qiu Ye, former postdoctoral fellow in immunology; Shengxi Liu, senior research associate in immunology; Dr. Chun Xie, former instructor in internal medicine; and Drs. Zhou and Liu.

Researchers from Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation; University of California, San Franciso; Long Island Jewish Health System, Manhasset; Medical University of South Carolina; and University of Alabama at Birmingham also participated, as did researchers from institutes in Sweden, Spain, Argentina, Germany, South Korea, Italy and the United Kingdom.

The study was funded in part by the Alliance for Lupus Research and the National Institutes of Health.
Visit http://www.utsouthwestern.org/rheumatology to learn more about clinical services in rheumatology at UT Southwestern. Visit http://www.utsouthwestern.org/dermatology to learn more about UT Southwestern’s clinical services in dermatology, including autoimmune diseases.

(http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/home/news/index.html)

FOR MORE STORIES ON HEALTH SEE http://jeannehambleton77.wordpress.com

Fear Keeps Many From Fighting RA Pain

From the FMS Global and UK News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

Courtesy of WebMD.com
By Bill Hendrick – WebMD Health News- Reviewed by Louise Chang, MD

March 25, 2009 — Many people with rheumatoid arthritis may have barriers that hinder optimal management of their pain, a study suggests.

Barriers to pain reduction, Canadian researchers say, include fear of medication side effects, fear of drug interactions, worry about drug addiction, concerns that the effects of medication might mask the disease, and aversion to taking too many pills.

McGill University scientists studied 60 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, all of whom were being treated by specialists. Of the rheumatoid arthritis sufferers, 53% described their pain as moderate to severe.

Forty-seven percent reported that pain was mild or absent. And 65% of all patients, including about half of those with moderate to severe pain, were satisfied with current methods to control suffering, the researchers report in the March issue of The Journal of Pain.

Although 87% of the patients reported that they expected to have “some” pain to “much” pain from their rheumatoid arthritis, only 13% didn’t expect any pain or only slight pain.

The researchers, led by Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, MD, of Montreal General Hospital at McGill University, were interested in the potential barriers to reducing pain that kept some people hurting.

The top barriers to optimal pain management found in the study participants included:

Worry of medication side effects (80%)

Not wanting to take “too many pills” (63%)

Worry about medication interactions (57%)

Worry of addiction (35%)

The researchers found that more than half of the patients had at least three barriers.

The researchers conclude that people with rheumatoid arthritis should be questioned vigorously about their pain, and that clinicians should explore potential barriers to effective pain control.

News release, McGill University.
Fitzcharles, M. The Journal of Pain, March 2009; vol 10: pp 300-305.
© 2009 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.
(http://www.webmd.com/rheumatoid-arthritis/news/20090325/is-fear-keeping-you-from-fighting-ra-pain?ecd=wnl_cbp_040209)

Hand Exercises Aid Rheumatoid Arthritis

Muscle-strengthening exercises may ease pain and help individuals with RA improve their quality of life

By Gina Shaw -WebMD the Magazine – Feature Reviewed by Michael W. Smith, MD

For 25 years, New Yorker Carol Solomon, 69, ran a knitting store. In 2006, a few years into retirement, she was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in both hands.

“I have movement in my thumb and in my pointer finger, but my other three fingers are pretty stiff,” she says. Solomon did not want to give up the knitting and sewing she loves, so she sought help from her doctor and physical therapists at New York’s Hospital for Special Surgery.

There is a saying about exercise and RA: Use it, but do not abuse it.

“Studies have shown that strengthening the muscles around the joints leads to overall improved function and better quality of life,” says Heather Williams, DPT, a physical therapist in the Hospital for Special Surgery’s Joint Mobility Center.

“Patients can be afraid to exercise those joints because of pain, but they really benefit from strengthening exercises.”

RA is an autoimmune disease in which the body attacks its own tissues. It is a chronic disease, but when diagnosed and treated early with a combination of medication and physical therapy, joint damage can be limited.

When it affects the hands or wrists, like Solomon’s, some helpful exercises include squeezing small exercise balls or putting the hand out flat, palm up, and bending each finger one by one into the palm. Take it slowly, advises the physical therapist. She says Solomon should try three sets of five repetitions of each exercise instead of 10 or 12 reps — and then work up to more as she builds her strength.

People with RA go through phases called “flare-ups,” with extremely swollen and painful joints, and then “subacute” phases when the disease is less active. Modifying activity depending on what phase you are in is important, says Theodore Fields, MD, clinical director of the Gosden-Robinson Early Arthritis Center at New York’s Hospital for Special Surgery.

“When you have a significant flare-up, the joints need more rest.”

Whatever kind of exercise you do, be sure to discuss your exercise plan with a physical therapist who understands RA.

“Have your physical therapist work out a home-exercise program that fits your needs and respects the joints you have trouble with,” says Fields.

Solomon knows her knitting needles will never fly like they used to, but she has started to work with yarn again and can even sew with a needle and thread, an impossible feat when she first was diagnosed.

“I am just seeing what I can do every day, and trying to adjust the way I do things to give myself as much function as possible,” she says.

Hand Exercise for Rheumatoid Arthritis

The Exercise:
Fill an empty box with small items such as nuts, screws, and bolts. Reach in and, handful by handful, pick the screws and bolts out of one box, place them in your other hand, and place in a second box.

The Benefit:
This exercise helps strengthen muscles around joints for improved finger mobility and helps prevent future joint damage.

Originally published in the September/October 2007 issue of WebMD the Magazine. © 2007 WebMD, Inc. All rights reserved.
(http://www.webmd.com/rheumatoid-arthritis/features/hand-exercises-aid-rheumatoid-arthritis?ecd=wnl_cbp_040209)

Chronic Opioid Therapy Guidelines Offer Direction for Physicians

From the FMS Global News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

Courtesy of Fibromyalgia Network – February 2009

While patients are rightfully concerned about not receiving adequate pain relief, physicians harbor fears about drug abuse, safety issues, and government oversight. New clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain patients, developed by consensus of the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine, may ease both patient and physician concerns.

The guidelines, published in the February issue of the Journal of Pain, offer a roadmap for physicians on how to safely prescribe opioids to patients with moderate to severe pain.* The authors specifically state that their report applies to patients with “chronic non-cancer pain conditions, including common conditions such as back pain, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and headache.”

Throughout the guidelines, physicians are urged to evaluate their patients’ pain and function on a regular basis. And, if doctors are worried that a patient is abusing or misusing the prescribed opioid, they may need to reduce the time between scheduled office visits. In addition, physicians are encouraged to look at all of the available options for treating patients’ chronic pain, including the use of opioids, and it is emphasized that this class of medications will seldom provide sufficient pain control. This means that patients placed on opioids will likely need to be prescribed medications from other drug classes as well as non-drug therapies. And, physicians who do not have the skill-set to prescribe opioids need to coordinate their patients’ care with another doctor who is experienced in providing this therapy.

The American Pain Society emphasized the following three points to all its members this month:

The guidelines are comprehensive and evidenced-based to assist physicians in managing chronic opioid therapy, according to the American Pain Society President Charles Inturrisi, Ph.D

“Regular monitoring of chronic opioid therapy patients is warranted because the therapeutic benefits of these medications are not static and can be affected by changes in the underlying pain condition, coexisting disease, or in psychological or social circumstances,” said Gilbert J. Fanciullo, M.D., director of the division of pain and palliative care at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center.

Cochair Perry Fine, M.D., professor of anesthesiology at the University of Utah Medical Center, added that doctors do not have to solely rely upon patient self reports. Pill counts, urine drug screening, family member or caregiver interviews, and prescription monitoring data may all be used to check for possible abuse or other opioid-related problems.

The message is clear that under most circumstances, there are reasonable ways for physicians to prescribe chronic opioid therapy for their patients in pain while emphasizing safety issues and minimizing side effects or the potential for drug misuse. The guidelines offer physicians 25 recommendations with detailed explanations on how to follow them—all to help doctors prescribe opioids to their chronic pain patients in a responsible fashion. In addition to the key points already made, here are other highlights from the published guidelines:

Clinicians may consider a trial of chronic opioid therapy (COT) for moderate to severe pain that is having an adverse impact on a patient’s function or quality of life as long as the therapeutic benefits outweigh the risks (abuse, misuse and addiction). Three different patient screening tools (questionnaires that are easy to administer) are included with the guidelines to help doctors assess potential risks associated with COT for a given patient (the SOAPP, the ORT, and the DIRE).

Before initiating a trial of COT, physicians should provide their patients with informed consent, which alerts patients to all of the potential risks associated with taking opioids. After informed consent, doctors should discuss with their patients a COT management plan that outlines the goals of therapy, expectations, monitoring requirements, etc. A sample consent form and management plan are included in the guideline.

Initial treatment with an opioid should be regarded as a therapeutic trial to determine if COT is effective. If the first opioid does not work or produces adverse side effects, other types of opioids may be tried, but patients need to keep in mind that opioids are prescribed on a trial basis.

Physicians should anticipate, identify, and track common opioid-associated side effects. Constipation is the most frequent problem, and unfortunately it does not go away or get better with continued use of the medication. With this in mind, doctors should recommend stool softeners or increased fiber intake when issuing patients an opioid prescription. Nausea or vomiting may occur but tends to diminish over a few days. If it lasts longer, doctors can prescribe a medication to treat this side effect. Sedation and clouded thinking usually goes away with continued opioid use, while reduction in sex hormones may appear down the road with COT. If a patient begins to experience a decrease in libido, sex hormones can be checked and supplemented if necessary. Other side effects may also occur, so patients and physicians need to be on the lookout for them.

Chronic pain is often a complex condition and physicians who prescribe COT should routinely promote other therapies, such as psychotherapy (pain can be awful to cope with), physical and occupational therapies for restoring function, and other non-drug approaches in addition to prescribing other non-opioid medications. The purpose of this recommendation is to treat the whole person and improve the odds that a patient with chronic pain will achieve a more fulfilling life.

Doctors need to counsel patients prior to starting COT and continue until a stable dose is reached or if the dose is later increased as the patients’ cognitive skills may be impaired for a short period of time. If clouded thought processes do occur, driving should temporarily be avoided … so patients might want to start an opioid on a weekend when they do not have to drive. After a stable dose is reached, there is no evidence to suggest that patients on COT should be restricted from driving or engaging in most work activities.

The opioid guidelines give your doctor the “how to” advice for prescribing opioids, including sample copies of patient screening questionnaires, a consent form, management plan, and full details on how to responsibly prescribe opioids. However, they also assume that the prescribing physician is already knowledgeable about issues concerning this class of medications (i.e., the guidelines cannot possibly convert a novice into an expert on COT). Neither the patient nor physician should feel awkward about the consent and management forms, or random urine tests. Doctors who follow these guidelines should be better equipped to implement opioid therapies for their chronic pain patients (such as fibromyalgia) in a safe manner.

* Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, et al. J Pain 10(2):113-130, 2009.

Calling the Kettle Black
… editorial comment

By Kristin Thorson, Editor, Fibromyalgia Network

Posted: February 27, 2009

If your newspaper ran the February 8th Associated Press article “Drugmakers’ push boosts ‘murky’ ailment,” implying that the drug industry has fabricated fibromyalgia in an effort to churn a profit, you have every right to be furious!1 Controversy sells, and that was what the reporter, Matthew Perrone banked on. Perrone sought out Fred Wolfe, M.D., of Wichita, KS, because he knew from the January 14, 2008 front-page article in the New York Times that Wolfe had a track record for trashing patients with fibromyalgia and big, bad pharma as well. It is ironic, however, that Wolfe would make derogatory statements about the drug industry when he is heavily funded by six drug companies himself.

Wolfe is the director (and paid employee) of the National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, a nonprofit registered as The Arthritis Research Center Foundation, Inc. Its mission is “conducting ongoing research to improve conditions for people with arthritis, fibromyalgia, lupus and other conditions.” He openly declares in his research papers, in which he is testing the effectiveness and safety of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis, that he is funded by Centocor, Aventis, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, and Abbott. So perhaps Wolfe’s dislike is not so much for the drug industry as it seems for fibromyalgia.

Prompted by mixed reports on increased cancer rates in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Wolfe conducted an observational study on the incidence of cancer in RA patients who took the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocking agents Enbrel (etanercept) or Remicade (infliximab).2 His findings were derived from information in the National Data Bank (NDB) and per the NDB’s agreement with Centocor, the maker of Remicade, the drug company was allowed to review Wolfe’s manuscript prior to publication. But Wolfe does not just cater to Centocor. His NDB organization has similar contractual agreements with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis.

Wolfe’s study contradicted earlier reports of increased cancer risks for RA patients taking Enbrel or Remicade. It also confirmed that TNF blocking drugs are linked to skin cancers, including potentially deadly melanomas. Instead of using his findings to alert the medical community that these drugs may pose a health hazard, Wolfe went on record with WebMD as stating: “The drugs, at this moment, do not seem to add any risk except for skin cancer and melanoma. This is a small overall risk and I do not think people should be concerned.” He also added that the risks did not outweigh the benefit for patients who truly need the new drugs.3

While there is no argument that people with RA deserve effective therapies, do you not think it is odd that Wolfe is the one pushing drugs on RA patients while in the recent AP article he bashes the drug industry for fabricating fibromyalgia to boost their sales? Yet he is quoted in the AP article as saying, “I think the purpose of most pharmaceutical company efforts is to do a little disease-mongering and to have people use their drugs.” Further in the article he says, “The underlying purpose here is really marketing, and they do that by sponsoring symposia and hiring physicians to give lectures and prepare materials.” Wolfe’s negative sentiments about fibromyalgia appear clear in a February 2009 report in which he writes, “Recently, regulatory authorities have approved treatments for fibromyalgia, offering some de facto support, although no proof, for fibromyalgia as a distinct disorder.”4 However, there was a time when RA had no “proof,” but that does not mean that the patients who suffered with it years ago did not have a real disease.

It is true that Wolfe was the lead author for the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria for fibromyalgia, but that was 18 years ago and much has changed.5 In 1990, the number of rheumatologists who were skeptical about the realness of fibromyalgia far outnumbered the believers. I should know, because I hosted an information booth on fibromyalgia at the annual rheumatology meetings throughout the 1990s, and in the early years I can attest to the ugly controversies surrounding this disease.

In 1994, Wolfe orchestrated a consensus conference (paid by the insurance industry) whose primary goal was to trivialize fibromyalgia and restrict patient care.6 Why he wanted to turn his back on fibromyalgia is still unknown, but his efforts failed. During the past eight years, the rheumatologists have rallied to increase the legitimacy of fibromyalgia by developing guidelines for improving the quality of research and for testing therapies to treat this patient population. Today, Wolfe and many of his colleagues do not see eye to eye when it comes to issues concerning fibromyalgia. At age 74, he appears to get his jollies by trash-talking fibromyalgia to headline-mongering reporters.

For all of you who were subjected to the AP story, I hope my comments help you understand the nonsensical nature of the article and that you can ignore any future reports that happen to quote Wolfe. I also want to make three additional points about the AP article:

Although Wolfe’s own nonprofit takes money from the drug companies, this does not mean that all nonprofits and organizations that help patients must do the same to stay afloat. Fibromyalgia Network and its sister organization, the American Fibromyalgia Syndrome Association (AFSA), have never received money from the pharmaceutical industry or other companies that could bias the way these two organizations operate.

Daniel Clauw, M.D., of the University of Michigan, did receive a small grant award from the National Fibromyalgia Research Association (NFRA) in Salem, OR, but the NFRA should not be confused with the National Fibromyalgia Association (NFA). NFRA does not receive money from the drugmakers.

The article implies that Clauw’s brain imaging research, which has documented many brain processing abnormalities over the past ten years, was tainted by drug money. That simply is not true because the funding for these studies came from government grants based on the merits of his proposals. “Most of us conducting research in the field of fibromyalgia were here ten years before the drug industry even took notice of this disease,” Clauw points out.

Perrone M. Associated Press © hosted by Google, Feb 8, 2009; (AP article).
Wolfe F, Michaud K. Arthritis Rheum 56(9):2886-2895, 2007.
DeNoon DJ. WebMD Health News Aug. 29, 2007; (WebMD article).
Wolfe F, Michaud K. J Rheumatol First Release Feb. 15, 2009; doi:10.3899/jrheum.080897.
Wolfe F, et al. Arthritis Rheum 33(2):160-72, 1990.
Wolfe F. J Rheumatol 23(3):534-9, 1996.

Kaufmann I, et al. Rheumatol Int [epub ahead of print] December 4, 2008.
Kaufmann I, et al. Clin Immunol 125:103-111, 2007.

(http://www.fmnetnews.com/basics-news.php#opioid)
All information on this site is copyrighted by
Fibromyalgia Network, P.O. Box 31750, Tucson, AZ 85751 (800) 853-2929.
This site is provided for informational purposes only. To remain unbiased, we do not accept endorsements, advertisements, or pharmaceutical industry grants. Patients should always consult their physician for medical advice and treatment.

What Makes a Disease Real?

From the FMS Global News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

Contents provided by the Harvard Medicine School – Courtesy MSN.health&fitness

Some conditions cannot be diagnosed with any test
By Robert Shmerling, M.D., Harvard Health Publications

Doctors can be a skeptical bunch. I have colleagues who flat out deny that a condition can be “real” unless they can observe it or detect it with a test.

Yet, many physicians deal with conditions all the time whose symptoms can’t be measured. For example:

Depression—A depressed person will usually have normal physical examinations, blood tests and, if necessary, a normal brain MRI.
Headaches—Most people who have headaches have normal test results.
Joint pain—People can have joint pain (arthralgia) without any joint inflammation (arthritis). The pain could be due to tendonitis, bursitis, vitamin D deficiency or thyroid disease. But often we can’t find any cause of the pain.

Doctors rarely do extensive testing for these conditions because abnormal results are rare and the tests are almost never helpful.

Millions of people are affected by diseases that have “subjective” symptoms and cannot be confirmed by observation or tests. These include fibromyalgia, most headaches (including migraine), irritable bowel syndrome. So, does this mean that these conditions aren’t “real?” They’re certainly real to the people suffering with them.

“It is all in your head”.

When a symptom cannot be explained, it does not mean that it is imaginary or due to a mental illness, psychiatric disorder or psychological distress. That is what is implied when a doctor tells a patient, “It’s all in your head.” At the very least, we should assume that the pain or unpleasant experience is real regardless of test results.

In the end, all pain is perceived by the brain. So, in a way, all pain is “all in your head.” Yet there is a tendency to relegate unobservable symptoms to the realm of the psychiatrist. Never mind that a psychiatric disease is “real” even when imaging and blood test results are normal. If you have ever witnessed psychotic behavior or been with someone who is severely depressed, it is clearly real.

Unexplained symptoms could be due to a disease that has not been detected yet. Ideally, doctors and patients should identify the cause if possible, rule out a dangerous condition, and treat the bothersome symptoms. And that is true whether the symptom is measureable or not.

What is in a name?

We usually expect the doctor to make a diagnosis and recommend a treatment when we have a problem. It is reassuring to know that your particular problem has a name. It means that other people have experienced it and that studies have assessed the effectiveness of various treatments.

Yet for many conditions, the name is only a label. It is convenient to apply a name to a particular combination of symptoms, even though the cause is unknown and no clear-cut abnormalities can be found. Examples include fibromyalgia syndrome and irritable bowel syndrome. Assigning a name to symptoms can be reassuring but it does not make the condition more or less “real.”

Focus on improving symptoms

There are times when even the smartest health care provider cannot come up with a logical, compelling or even reasonable explanation for a person’s symptoms. In those cases, it is important not to get too focused on explaining or labeling them. Instead, the doctor should focus on:

Not missing some important clue

Treating the symptoms

In many fields of medicine, doctors spend all day improving symptoms rather than making a diagnosis. Headache specialists, for example, must be convinced there is no brain tumor, no meningitis, and no other serious and treatable cause of the pain. But once that happens, attention turns toward treatment rather than on sorting out a specific cause.

This can be frustrating for both patients and doctors. But until we understand the specific causes of common conditions like headaches, back pain, ringing in the ears (tinnitus) and chronic fatigue, controlling symptoms, not a name, is what will help the most.

The bottom line

Once again this shows that there is more uncertainty in medicine than most people think. But that does not mean a person is imagining their symptoms.

As I see it, debating the “realness” of symptoms is often a waste of time. Unless a person is deliberately “faking” symptoms (a rare event in most doctors’ practices), they are just as real as for those with an observable, measurable and testable condition.

Having names are nice, but they are not always helpful. All other things being equal, I would rather have a nameless condition that is well-treated than a definite, but untreatable diagnosis.

Copyright © 2009 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College. Used with permission of StayWell. All rights reserved. Harvard Medical School does not approve or endorse any products on the page. Harvard is the sole creator of its editorial content, and advertisers are not allowed to influence the language or images Harvard uses.

(http://health.msn.com/health-topics/articlepage.aspx?cp-documentid=100233740)

Chili Pepper Compound Can Bring Pain Relief

From the FMS News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

COURTESY usnews.com Health Day – Monday March 16

Capsaicin works on nerves to ease joint discomfort, scientists say

(HealthDay News) – University of Buffalo scientists say they have found how capsaicin, the compound that gives chili peppers their fiery flavor, also works to relieve joint and muscle pain.

In a study appearing Tuesday in the journal PLoS Biology, researchers found that capsaicin flips on nerve-ending receptors that sense both pain and heat.

“The receptor acts like a gate to the neurons. When stimulated it opens, letting outside calcium enter the cells until the receptor shuts down, a process called desensitization,” study leader Feng Qin, an associate professor at the university’s School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, said in a news release issued by the institution.
The flood of calcium changes the levels at which the receptors detect pain signal. “In other words, the receptor had not desensitized per se, but its responsiveness range was shifted,” Qin said.

While capsaicin has been used in folk medicines for generations, knowing how it works in relation to PIP2 may lead to developing other analgesics that ease pain without first causing irritation on their own, the team said.

More information

The U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has more about capsaicin .
(http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/02/25/chili-pepper-compound-can-bring-pain-relief.html)

Finding Effective Treatment for Your Chronic Pain

Studies are underway to look into the effectiveness of alternative ways of delivering pain medications

By January W. Payne

Chronic pain is a problem that—when healthcare, lost income, and lost productivity are taken into account—is estimated to cost about $100 billion in the United States each year. More than a quarter of Americans age 20 or older, or about 76.5 million people, say they’ve experienced pain that lasted longer than 24 hours, according to the American Pain Foundation—and 42 percent have endured pain lasting longer than a year. Nobody keeps good long-term national stats, but if North Carolina’s experience is any guide, the numbers are on the rise.

A just-published study in the Archives of Internal Medicine found that the prevalence of chronic low-back pain in the state more than doubled, to 10.2 percent, between 1992 and 2006. Paul J. Christo, assistant professor and director of the Multidisciplinary Pain Fellowship at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, calls undiagnosed, untreated, or undertreated pain a “significant public-health problem.”

Chronic pain encompasses a multitude of ills, from back pain, headaches, neck pain, and conditions like arthritis and fibromyalgia to pain that develops as a result of cancer treatment and lingers for months or even years. Low-back pain, migraines, and joint pain (particularly in the knees) are among the most common complaints, according to the National Center for Health Statistics. knee pains,

Still, while it may have different origins, chronic pain “can be viewed as an illness in its own right because of its effect on function,” says Russell Portenoy, chairman of the department of pain medicine and palliative care at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City.

Studies have shown that some people with chronic pain have brain abnormalities, though the connection between that and pain is not well understood. One recent study, for instance, showed that women with fibromyalgia had blood flow abnormalities in a region of the brain known to discriminate the intensity of pain that were not observed on CT scans done in healthy women.

Another study showed that chronic pain may harm the wiring of the brain, as demonstrated on functional MRIs. Chronic pain may also be caused by a problem with the “fight or flight” response, Christo says. “We believe that in certain pain conditions . . . the stress response can worsen pain because that stress response releases a chemical called noroepinephrine. . . . And noroepinephrine binds to certain receptors in the body that trigger pain.”

“Pain is essentially an alarm system that is designed to grab your attention, and when it works properly, it signals harm or healing,” says Scott Fishman, professor and chief of the division of pain medicine at the University of California-Davis School of Medicine. When the body heals, the pain should dissipate, but “the nervous system can become injured,” Fishman says. “That’s when the symptom of pain becomes the disease of chronic pain.”

Finding relief can take quite an effort, since the causes are often not immediately clear and there is not a sure-fire treatment. The battle can require a team of experts, so the multidisciplinary pain clinics or pain management programs that have sprouted up at hospitals, rehab centers, and in free-standing facilities over the past decade or so may be of particular help.

The clinics provide an all-in-one setting for care that, in addition to pain management specialists who may be trained as neurologists, psychiatrists, physiatrists, or anesthesiologists, may include physical therapists, family and vocational counselors, and massage therapists, for example. (The American Chronic Pain Association offers advice on selecting a pain clinic.)

After a full assessment, tailored treatment may include medications from anti-inflammatory drugs to antidepressants to opioids. Since commonly prescribed opioid medications such as oxycodone, fentanyl, and morphine can cause addiction, the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine have just released the first comprehensive clinical practice guidelines to help physicians make treatment decisions.

The guidelines, published in the Journal of Pain, suggest that physicians regularly assess people taking long-term opioids and do periodic drug screenings of patients who are considered to be at risk for abuse or addiction. Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration announced plans this month to require the brand-name and generic makers of morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, and methadone to assist with a plan to reduce the risks associated with the drugs.

Other treatment options include injections of steroids or other medications, nerve blocks that interrupt pain signals, physical therapy, alternative therapies, and psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy, biofeedback, and guided imagery and other relaxation techniques. Acupuncture, which some people with pain find helpful, is thought to ease pain by raising the level of endorphins in the body, Christo says. “Endorphins are sort of like opioids. . . . They are natural pain relievers,” he says.

“They are released when the body experiences pain—when you sprain your ankle, cut your finger, in response to injury.” Still, research offers conflicting conclusions about the pain-relieving effects of acupuncture. A review of 13 studies published last month in British Medical Journal found that acupuncture offered only a small level of pain relief for people with low-back pain, migraines, knee osteoarthritis, and postoperative pain.

Jennifer Phillips, 41, of Providence Forge, Va., saw 54 doctors before the fibromyalgia that caused her pain was diagnosed in 1996. Finally, after seeing an internist whose nurse had fibromyalgia, she found a routine that works for her: a combination of proper sleep (achieved, in part, using the tricylic antidepressant amitriptyline), daily supplements of vitamins, magnesium, and potassium, plenty of water, and a low-carb diet.

The search is on for greater relief. Studies are underway to look into the safety and effectiveness of alternative ways of delivering pain medications, such as an inhaled form of fentanyl that would get the drug into the patient’s system more quickly. For older people who have fractures of the spine, vertebroplasty and kyphotlasty—two minimally invasive techniques in which bone cement is injected into the collapsed bone in the spine—can result in “significant pain reduction,”

Christo says. In the ongoing debate over how best to handle back pain, a study just published in the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons finds that the most effective way to treat most degenerative disc disease cases is to combine physical therapy and anti-inflammatory medications, rather than having surgery.
While it may seem counterintuitive, people with chronic pain should try to get exercise. Experts say it is important to keep moving, both for the usual cardiovascular reasons and in order to avoid muscle atrophy. A supervised, individually designed exercise program, incorporating stretching or strengthening, may improve pain and functioning in people with chronic low-back pain, according to a 2005 study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

A physical therapist or personal trainer can offer the necessary advice. In fact, staying in bed for more than a day or two can make back pain worse, according to the National Library of Medicine’s MedlinePlus.

Jeff Nance of Indianapolis, whose chronic pain is caused by degenerative disc disease and spinal stenosis of his lower back, recalls that he barely wanted to leave his home three years ago. Then he discovered the Meridian Health Group pain clinic in Indianapolis. Now he is working full time again, and he recently participated in an annual bike ride across the state of Indiana. Nance goes back to the clinic every few months for a check of his medications, and he sees a psychologist a couple of times a month.

“What we try to do is really recognize that people can have pain for all kinds of reasons, [and we] find as many of those causes as possible and treat them in the most specific fashion as possible,” says Michael Clark, associate professor and director of the Chronic Pain Treatment Program in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Johns Hopkins Hospital. “Ultimately, you’d like to get somebody well.”

(http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/pain/2009/02/10//finding-effective-treatment-for-your-chronic-pain.html?loomia_ow=t0:a41:g2:r2:c0.160667:b22273524&s_cid=loomia:chili-pepper-compound)

Copyright © 2009 U.S.News & World Report LP All rights reserved.

What a sleep study can reveal about fibromyalgia

From the FMS Global New Desk of Jeanne Hambleton
Courtesy Eurekalert.com

Michigan Tech, U. Michigan team up on sleep research

Research engineers and sleep medicine specialists from two Michigan universities have joined technical and clinical hands to put innovative quantitative analysis, signal-processing technology and computer algorithms to work in the sleep lab. One of their recent findings is that a new approach to analyzing sleep fragmentation appears to distinguish fibromyalgia patients from healthy controls.

Joseph W. Burns, a research scientist and engineer at the Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI); Ronald D. Chervin, director of the University of Michigan’s Michael S. Aldrich Sleep Disorders Laboratory; and Leslie Crofford, director of the Center for the Advancement of Women’s Health at the University of Kentucky, report the results of their study in the current issue of the journal Sleep Medicine.

MTRI, a freestanding research institute acquired by Michigan Technological University in 2006 and based in Ann Arbor, specializes in remote sensors that collect data, and in signal processing, using algorithms or computer programs to analyze and correlate the information the sensors gather. MTRI has developed an ongoing collaboration with the University of Michigan’s sleep laboratory, one of the nation’s leading clinical and research centers specializing in sleep medicine.

This several-year collaboration provided MTRI’s first opportunities to apply quantitative analysis, remote sensing technology and computer algorithms to clinical challenges, said Burns. “In this case, our analyses of sleep stage dynamics suggest potential clinical relevance,” he noted. Newly explored measures of sleep fragmentation seem to correlate—at least in this study—with levels of pain reported by fibromyalgia patients.

Burns, who has a PhD in electrical engineering, finds that more and more of his research is taking a biomedical turn. He and his team are working with Chervin to use signal-processing technology to record and analyze the brain waves and biophysical responses of children and adults with a variety of sleep disorders. They hope it will help them better understand conventional sleep patterns, as well as diagnose and treat sleep disorders.

They presented the results of research related to assessment of sleep-disordered breathing and sleep fragmentation at Sleep 2008, an international sleep research conference, in Baltimore in June.

Patients who may have sleep disorders often undergo complicated and expensive tests in sleep laboratories, Chervin explained. These studies collect an assortment of biophysical data that reflect brain, cardiovascular and muscle activity throughout the night. Up to now, these data had to be analyzed manually by highly trained technicians.

“We are collaborating to find new ways to analyze routinely collected data in a way that will be meaningful to the patient’s health and will help us understand how sleep disorders affect brain functions,” he said.

Automated analysis of data potentially can provide improved assessments and reduce the cost of sleep studies, Burns noted. For example, MTRI and UM have developed an automated technique for assessing the severity of sleep-disordered breathing, using just two signals—brain waves and respiration—instead of the dozen or more signals typically needed for standard visual scoring of a sleep study.

“It may even become possible for people to take sleep tests—simpler and more effective than some of those currently available—at home where they can sleep in their own familiar bedrooms,” he suggested.

Both partners are reaping the benefits of the collaboration, Burns said. Not only can automated technology improve clinical research; what the MTRI scientists have learned about biomedical techniques such as brain mapping is informing their more traditional work on radar and optical sensing technology.

Michigan Tech and UM have patented the new algorithm for assessing sleep-disordered breathing, which enables them to study what the extra work of breathing does to the brainwaves of patients with sleep apnea, a sleep disorder in which breathing stops briefly many times during sleep. Sleep apnea has been linked to excessive daytime sleepiness, cognitive changes and other health effects, and to hyperactive behavior in children.

The universities have filed an application for another patent for an algorithm that helps automate the assessment of patients with REM Sleep Behavior Disorder. People with this neurological condition act out their dreams during Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep, which can cause them to harm themselves or a bed partner while they are asleep.

Burns and Chervin published the results of that study in the December 2007 issue of the journal Sleep.

The team plans to investigate other sleep disorders and to continue to develop automated processing techniques to improve the performance and efficiency of sleep disorder diagnosis and assessment.

Michigan Technological University is a leading public research university, conducting research, developing new technologies and preparing students to create the future for a prosperous and sustainable world. Michigan Tech offers more than 120 undergraduate and graduate degree programs in engineering, forestry and environmental sciences, computing, technology, business and economics, natural and physical sciences, arts, humanities and social sciences.

Internationally renowned for patient care, research and education, the University of Michigan Health System has been a leader in American medicine for more than a century and a half. UMHS includes the U-M Medical School, three nationally ranked hospitals, 40 outpatient health centers, and a number of specialized programs for treatment and research in cancer, cardiovascular disease, geriatrics, depression, diabetes, vision, women’s health, organ transplant and other specialties. Its biomedical research community is one of the nation’s largest, winning more than $342 million in funding each year while generating more than 120 newly disclosed inventions annually.

Contact: Jennifer Donovan – jdonovan@mtu.edu – 906-487-4521 – Michigan Technological University

Fibromyalgia Research News

From the Fibromyalgia FMS Global News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine – NCBI – http://www.pubmed.gov
and the National Institutes of Health

Multidisciplinary care and stepwise treatment for fibromyalgia
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 9;69(12):e35.

Arnold LM, Bradley LA, Clauw DJ, Glass JM, Goldenberg DL.
Division of Women’s Health Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Fibromyalgia is a common musculoskeletal pain condition associated with chronic widespread pain, tenderness at various points on the body, fatigue, sleep abnormalities, and common comorbidity with psychiatric and medical disorders. Research into pharmacologic remedies for fibromyalgia has demonstrated efficacy for a variety of agents, but pharmacology is only one piece of the puzzle when it comes to successful management of fibromyalgia. Sensitive and appropriate methods of diagnosis and an integrated treatment plan including proper patient education, aerobic exercise, and cognitive-behavioral therapy have been shown effective in alleviating fibromyalgic symptoms. The development of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary disease management strategy is a difficult but essential challenge facing clinicians treating patients with fibromyalgia. Copyright 2008 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

PMID: 19203485 [PubMed - in process] Courtesy of NCBI & PubMed

Assessing and diagnosing fibromyalgia in the clinical setting
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Nov 6;69(11):e33.

Clauw DJ.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Fibromyalgia is a common and disabling condition that may be difficult to assess and diagnose owing to its wide range of symptoms and common comorbidities. The most common symptoms of fibromyalgia include widespread pain over the whole body, pain at specific tender points, fatigue, memory and other cognitive problems, sleep and mood disturbances, and impaired functioning. Accurately diagnosing fibromyalgia may require diagnostic testing and physical examinations such as tender points examinations; however, patients with longstanding symptoms may be diagnosed according to a symptom-based fibromyalgia criteria checklist. This activity provides a sample assessment and diagnosis in a clinical situation. Copyright 2008 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

PMID: 19200425 [PubMed - in process] Courtesy of NCBI & PubMed

Evaluating obesity in fibromyalgia: neuroendocrine biomarkers, symptoms, and functions
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Jan 27. [Epub ahead of print]

Okifuji A, Bradshaw DH, Olson C

Pain Research and Management Center, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Utah, 615 Arapeen Drive, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA, akiko.okifuji@hsc.utah.edu.

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between obesity and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). This study was conducted at the University of Utah Pain Management and Research Center, Salt Lake City, Utah. Thirty-eight FMS patients were included in this study. Neuroendocrine indices (catecholamines, cortisol, C-reactive protein [CRP], and interleukin-6), symptom measures (Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), sleep indices (Actigraph), and physical functioning (treadmill testing) were measured. Body mass index (BMI) provided the primary indicator of obesity. Approximately 50% of the patients were obese and an additional 21% were overweight. Strong positive associations were found between BMI and levels of IL-6 (r = 0.52) and epinephrine (r = 0.54), and somewhat weaker associations with cortisol (r = 0.32) and CRP (r = 0.37). BMI was also related to maximal heart rate (r = 0.33) and inversely related to distance walked (r = -0.41). BMI was associated with disturbed sleep: total sleep time (r = -0.56) and sleep efficiency (r = -0.44). No associations between self-reported symptoms and BMI were found. This study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that obesity plays a role in FMS-related dysfunction.

PMID: 19172342 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Courtesy of NCBI & PubMed

Increased frequencies of hysterectomy and early menopause in fibromyalgia patients: a comparative study
Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print]

Pamuk ON, Dönmez S, Cakir N.

The objective was to determine the relationship between symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM) and early menopause and hysterectomy. We included 115 postmenopausal patients with FM (mean age 54.6 +/- 7.6) and 67 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (mean age 55.5 +/- 9) into our study. All patients were questioned about the severity of their symptoms of FM, anxiety, and depression by using a visual analog scale and FM impact questionnaire. Patients’ history of menopause and hysterectomy were recorded. Menopause ( 0.05). FM-related symptoms started in 30 patients (26.1%) with FM with menopause or within the first postmenopausal year. When the clinical features of FM patients whose symptoms started within the first menopausal year were compared to other FM patients; it was observed that the frequency of early menopause was higher in the former group (p = 0.048). Duke anxiety and depression score was higher in patients with hysterectomy whose FM symptoms started within the first year of post-hysterectomy than other FM patients (9.1 +/- 2.7 vs. 6.7 +/- 2.7, p = 0.022). Early menopause and hysterectomy may be one of the factors contributing to the development of FM.

PMID: 19169621 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Courtesy of NCBI & PubMed

A ‘Murky Business’ – Yes it is REAL

AP Associated Press IMPACT:

Drug makers’ push boosts ‘murky’ ailment

Collated by Jeanne Hambleton FMS Global News Desk ©2009        

 

A ‘Murky Business’ – Yes it is REAL

AP Associated Press IMPACT:

Drug makers’ push boosts ‘murky’ ailment

Collated by Jeanne Hambleton FMS Global News Desk ©2009        

 

Business Writer Matthew Perrone for AP: Associated Press has  “set the cat among the pigeons” with his reference to fibromyalgia and ‘murky ailments’. Posted in Washington on February 8 2009, this article has the promise of the same reaction given to the infamous IS DISEASE REAL article on fibromyalgia that appeared in the New York Times.

 

The  above story by NY Times reporter Alex Berenson published January 14, 2008 can be read at  <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/14/health/14pain.htmlem&ex=1200459600&en=bac45d5aff5a17d7&ei=5087> 

 

The members of the fibromyalgia community who are somewhat sensitive about questions suggesting FMS is an imaginary illness, has risen to the bait and letters are flocking in from around the USA where the article was published and in the UK, where it has been given coverage by FMS Global News.

 

Matthew Perrone, a business writer, suggests huge sums of money were provided by two drug companies last year in an endeavor to raise awareness of a “murky illness” as well as boost the sales of their medication recently approved by the Food & Drugs Association (FDA.). The writer claims the drug companies have been “drowning out unresolved questions” …. “whether it is a real disease at all”. 

 

Oooophs. That went down like a lead balloon.

 

Matthew Perrone discovered that the two drug companies, Pfizer and Eli Lilly, have in the first nine months of 2008 donated upward of $6 million towards educational events and to supporting non-profit making medical conferences. He claims this sum is greater than funds given to Alzheimer’s and diabetes. Top priority for funding by Pfizer was for cancer, AIDS and the fibromyalgia. Similarly Eli Lilly favoured cancer, depression and fibromyalgia.

 

While reminding readers that the cause for fibromyalgia still not known, with no specific test to confirm diagnosis, patients often showed overlapping symptoms with other neurological diseases. He claimed the specialists are in no doubt about the pain these patients suffer but they cannot agree how it should be treated and what illness it actually is.

 

It is believed by many patients and doctors, says Matthew Perrone, that the actions of the drug manufacturers are helping to solved the mysteries of fibromyalgia within the medical profession. He does acknowledge that patients with fibromyalgia say doctors often disbelieved them claiming the pains are imaginary or “all in your head.”

 

The article adds “critics say the companies are hyping fibromyalgia along with their treatments, and that the grant making is a textbook example of how drug makers unduly influence doctors and patients.”

 

Dr Frederick Wolfe, a member of the panel who helped to definite the criteria for fibromyalgia and adopt the name in 1990, suggests the drug companies are guilty of  “a little disease-mongering” to encourage patients to buy their medication. The business writer reports that the companies have been successful in the actions showing huge increases in sales and profits between 2007 and 2008 for Lyrica and Cymbalta –both approved for the treatment of fibromyalgia by the FDA. 

 

Responding to questions from the author the drug companies say their actions are “just the evolution of greater awareness” of a condition that has been poorly managed and neglected. 

 

The article includes the story of a patient taking both Cymbalta and Lyrica and three other medications. Describing her medicated condition as fibro fog she is quoted as saying she is so medicated she feels as though she is not here. Struggling to find money for her medication she claimed she is receiving free samples of Lyrica from the drug company representative to help her get through the month.

 

The article reports both drug companies spent of $125 million on advertising in the first nine months of 2008.

 

Grants from the drug companies are available for education for doctors, non-profit making groups and advocacy. Some of this money is used for research and patients outreach.

 

President of the USA National Fibromyalgia Association Lynne Matallana is quoted as saying lack funding would impact on patients’ care due to lack of money for medical education. Matthew Perrone claims that 40% of the funding for the $1.5 million a year Association’s operations is provided by corporate funds, like those given by Eli Lilly and Pfizer. Lynne Matallana who has fibromyalgia claimed she visited 37 doctors before being diagnosed.

 

In a Pfizer television commercial the drug company acknowledged fibromyalgia is real, but Matthew Perrone says the researchers report it is not that easy. The condition usually known as a syndrome, has been described as a disease, a collection of symptoms and even a behaviour disorder.

 

This description suggesting a behaviour disorder has caused some concern among the fibromyalgia community who insist it is not a mental disorder.

 

It is thought that up to 12million people in the USA may have fibromyalgia in the USA with a large percentage of them women.

 

Market research on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry indicated that possibly 50% of this number are not diagnosed said Dr. Daniel Clauw (University of Michigan).

 

Dr. Don Goldenberg (Tufts University) who has spent 30 years working with fibromyalgia claims it remains a “murky area”.  He said patients preferred to have a name for what ailed them.  It was suggested that while Dr. Goldenberg is a diagnosing patients he said a number of doctors no longer diagnosed FMS patients suggesting it is a “catchall covering a range of symptoms”.

 

A professor at the University of North Carolina Dr. Nortin Hadler believes identifying fibromyalgia can “doom” patients to endure suffering for the rest of their lifetime and just confirms to them that this is a condition with no cure.  Dr. Hadler said the likelihood for patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia improving was “pretty dismal”

 

His view was that fibromyalgia was not a medical disease but a psychological condition (‘having to do with the mind’). He believed therapy should be available instead of drugs and medication, to help patients “unlearn” their problem.

 

Dr. Clauw whose research has revealed patient’ brains reveal  “unusual activity” when suffering pain, confirms fibromyalgia is a legitimate disease and he had no time for experts who analyse definitions instead of helping patients.  He also agreed that the new drugs approved by the FDA do not work for all  patients.

 

This article is a summary of  a story published by AP Associated Press distributed by Google.  © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jZDQjkt1twJK_3GpRKJUbXZ_-oMwD967HPG81

 

Fibromyalgia is not ‘murky’ to millions of people who live with it

Letter to the Editor of CantonRep.com  Posted Feb 13, 2009 

 

I read with interest “Drug makers push boosts a ‘murky’ ailment” (Feb. 9). I am both a patient with fibromyalgia and a physician who specializes in this condition, so I find it incredible when the article refers to so-called experts who are skeptical that the diagnosis even exists and that drug makers are somehow responsible for perpetuating this condition. 



Fibromyalgia is not “murky” to the many millions of patients worldwide who have it, and to the thousands of doctors who diagnose and treat it. It is a real condition with its own insurance code, specific diagnostic criteria and proven helpful treatments. It is recognized by major medical and legal organizations, including the Food and Drug Administration. 



We have not found a cure yet, but ongoing research is necessary to help improve the quality of lives of those who suffer from this chronic disease. To date, the FDA has approved three medicines for treatment of fibromyalgia pain.

These so-called experts mentioned in the article do not believe fibromyalgia exists, thus they never diagnose or treat it. To me, no experience with this condition means no expertise. Fortunately for patients, there are many primary-care doctors and specialists  (in the USA) who understand, research and treat fibromyalgia: the true experts. 



Unlike the critics, these professionals have actual experience and skills in trying to improve lives affected by chronic pain and will prescribe approved medications, not blame drug makers or patients for the pain. The true experts may not be as vocal as the so-called experts, but their efforts to help those with fibromyalgia have spoken the loudest. 


MARK J. PELLEGRINO, M.D., 

JACKSON TOWNSHIP

Reproduced courtesy of CantonRep.com Connecting Stark County

(http://www.cantonrep.com/opinion/letters/x817675485/Fibromyalgia-isnt-murky-to-millions-of-people-who-live-with-it)

 

National Fibromyalgia Association’s Response to

AP Article on Drug Companies & Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia & CFS Blog Friday February 13, 2009

By Adrienne Dellwo, About.com Guide to Fibromyalgia & CFS

 

The inaccuracies of the recent AP report, Drug makers push boosts ‘murky’ illness, go even beyond what I pointed out in a recent blog. Here is the response from Lynne Matallana, president of the National Fibromyalgia Association:

“To the editors:

“The recent Associated Press story on fibromyalgia hardly qualifies as news; it merely regurgitates the same arguments that have been published in the past and offers the opinions of the same two men who have built careers out of drawing attention away from the hundreds of scientists who continue to make amazing scientific strides toward understanding the underlying cause(s) and pathophysiology of what fibromyalgia patients experience.

 

“By perpetuating this message, the article implies that it is more acceptable to debate names or labels for this “set of symptoms” and to point fingers at the usual “villains” (i.e.: pharma and the non-profits who accept money from them), than to focus on the millions of desperate patients who deserve to have a voice in the discussion.

 

“The fact is that credible medical institutions and organizations recognize fibromyalgia as a life-altering disease; the fact is that patients who suffer with FM depend on the medical system (including pharmaceutical companies) to help them inform the public that this is a very real illness and that they need treatments, including pharmaceutical agents, to help them get through each day and to look forward to some sort of quality of life in the future.

 

“This article misinforms readers in a way that undermines and victimizes innocent people. By telling only selective parts of the story the author is perpetuating misperceptions and making it difficult, if not impossible, for readers to grasp what is truly important: that we need to stop debating and pointing fingers and start asking why it is perceived as acceptable to stigmatize a patient population just because medical research has not yet provided us with all the information needed to understand that particular illness. Every illness seems to go through a stage of having to prove its legitimacy, but why should the patients be suspect during that phase of research?

 

“Why would AP print information that is simply not true – people with fibromyalgia are “more likely to have a history of mental illness and are economically disadvantaged?” That is totally false, as is the writer’s statement that the National Fibromyalgia Research Association received pharma money to fund Dr. Clauw’s functional MRI study. The money for all of the NFRA’s funded research came from the founder (the husband of a fibromyalgia patient), general donations, and revenue generated from a non-profit bingo game. (Yes, the FM community has had to rely on bingo games to fund our research!)

 

“How can we allow the system to fail millions of people whose only ‘fault’ is to have developed a devastating illness? Along with the rest of the fibromyalgia patient community, I look forward to the day when society (including the medical community, the media, and our government agencies) accepts the responsibility of treating fibromyalgia patients like any other group of chronically ill patients; when it is a given that fibromyalgia will be further studied, that treatments will be developed and made accessible to patients, that the media presents the facts rather than perpetuating threadbare controversies.

“Now that would be news worth printing.

“Sincerely,

“Lynne Matallana

President, National Fibromyalgia Association”

Courtesy About.com

http://chronicfatigue.about.com/b/2009/02/13/national-fibromyalgia-associations-response-to-ap-article-on-drug-companies-fibromyalgia.htm

 

A ‘Murky Business’. Yes it is REAL

http://fmsglobalnews.wordpress.com

 A FIBROMITE’S RESPONSE

 

To the Editor and Business Writer Matthew Perrone Associated Press (info@ap.org).

Dear Sirs,

It is with great distress that I have read the article that denies the existence of this truly horrible illness. I would like to stress firstly that I am not a previous sufferer of mental illness, although I am now being treated for depression, and I am from an economically secure background.

 

Just answer me one question, if this illness is all in my head, how come so many millions of us suffer from such similar symptoms. Are we transmitting then to each other telepathically? We do not suffer identical intensity of each symptom, some us have irritable bowel syndrome worse than others for instance, but we all suffer from unexplained severe pain, terrible tiredness and loss of the quality of our lives.

 

I, sir, am a qualified psychologist who for a long time thought I was going mad, especially as every test I had came back negative. To actually realise that the awful symptoms I was suffering were not a result of “being in my head” came as a great relief and if drug companies are making profits that can be used to find out what causes this and find a cure I say hallelujah!!!

 

Articles like this do nothing to help and indeed set us back and damage us immeasurably in our quest to be taken seriously and find a cure.

 

Yours in despair

Carolyn from Felpham, West Sussex. UK

 

 THE FIBROMYALGIA COMMUNITY RESPONDS

 TO ASSOCIATED PRESS ARTICLE

 

1. The Associated Press article by Matthew Perrone (February 8, 2009, “Drug makers’ push boosts ‘murky’ aliment) has drawn several comments.

Click here to read the article.

Click here to read the NFA’s response, as well as some comments by other readers.

To send a letter to AP business editor Kevin Noble or writer Matthew Perrone, email info@ap.org  (no attachments).

2. The NFA is in the process of contacting media outlets across the nation that published Mr. Perrone’s article. In addition to sharing the disappointment of the fibromyalgia community, our response provides accurate information about fibromyalgia, including the science behind fibromyalgia and the lack of research funding.

3. For a list of 10 ways to respond to negative and false Information about fibromyalgia, click here.

4. Several points made in the AP article were addressed by fibromyalgia experts on February 11, 2009 during a medical talk show produced by Patient Power. Guests included leading FM researcher Daniel Clauw, MD, professor of medicine in the Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan Health System; Martha Beck, Ph.D., who has been diagnosed with fibromyalgia; and Lynne Matallana, president and founder of the National Fibromyalgia Association. Click here to listen.

5. The NFA has created two information sheets—the Fibromyalgia Fact Sheet and Recognition, Research and Science—for your reference and use in helping dispel misunderstandings about fibromyalgia.

Click here to view the Fibromyalgia Fact Sheet.

Click here to view an overview on Recognition, Research and Science.

6. In addition to a variety of articles about managing FM symptoms, overlapping conditions, and healthy lifestyle choices, the NFA’s 10-year anniversary issue (September-November 2007) includes a special section on the History of Fibromyalgia. Topics include:

The state of FM and how it has changed in the last 10 years

How changing perspectives on FM have impacted the specialties that focus on it  

How patients have succeeded in changing public perception of FM

The latest studies on medications commonly prescribed to treat FM. Click here 

 

Undermining the Validity of FM


Sharon Waldrop – Director, Fibromyalgia Association of Michigan USA

 

My name is Sharon Waldrop. I am the Founder and Director of the Fibromyalgia Association of Michigan, a volunteer nonprofit organization. I am a patient living with fibromyalgia (FM) and I am deeply disappointed in the article that ran yesterday in the Free Press copied off the AP. I am writing to you to ask if you would do a story on fibromyalgia to provide a balanced report on fibromyalgia? 

I am very sad that the millions of people who are suffering and struggling every minute of every day with fibromyalgia never get a chance to give their viewpoint in the media. Instead articles are written to please editors who have a formula that dictates what type of story “gets attention” and therefore gets printed …never taking into consideration or caring about the ramifications that their message will have on millions of innocent people.


The ramifications are that more marriages crumble, friendships (i.e. support systems) end, people lose jobs, people are denied access to care because the opinions of a select few are given mass attention. Credible medical institutions like Johns Hopkins University, the University of Michigan, the National Institutes of Health, (just to name a few), recognize fibromyalgia as a life-altering disease. It is time to treat FM patients with respect. Millions of people suffer from FM.  Millions more are suffering too as they watch their loved one struggle. These people do not need to read stories that FM is not real. They need to read stories about the exciting medical advances in fibromyalgia like the brain imaging study done at the University of Michigan that concretely prove people’s brains with FM act differently than people without FM. 

They need to be given hope and given the treatment they deserve as a human being.

My group has over 800 members in the Metro Detroit area.  We provide support and education to people affected by fibromyalgia.  People come to me in tears because they don’t know where to go for help. I am pleased that for 11 years I have given people a place to go – even if it is just for one night a month. No human being should have to fight an illness and also fight with spouses, friends, employers and yes, even doctors that they are in disabling physical pain. The question is not why do we continue to undermine the validity of FM but why are people afraid to provide support to people suffering from the chronic pain of fibromyalgia?
 In this time of uncertainty in the world, people more than ever need hope and help. Please will you write a story to help your readers understand FM? On behalf of my group we would greatly appreciate it.

 

Is Fibromyalgia Real?
 Andrew Schorr -
Founder Patient Power

We could have predicted it. Naysayers who say that now there are three approved prescriptions medicines for fibromyalgia, a chronic pain syndrome, marketing is fueling hype hype about a condition some people say is all in a patient’s head.

Here we go again. The drug companies are always an easy target. When a drug is a success it can bring in more than a billion dollars a year. Treatments are costly and many people, including millions with no insurance or who are under insured, struggle to pay for them. So the pharmaceutical industry continues to have a public relations problem.

But none of that has anything to do with whether people, primarily women, are suffering with debilitating pain, pain that is effectively treated often by the approved medicines.

Critics including some doctors say that because there is no definitive test for fibromyalgia it is a disservice to rush to treatment with the new drugs when maybe some patients need psychotherapy instead. It is in the patient’s head.

I am not qualified to evaluate who needs the medicines and who does not. But I do know this: the FDA advisory panels and the FDA itself would not have approved the medicines, nor would the drug companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars on clinic trials, if they had no effectiveness.

After approval the drug companies have hit the airwaves with television commercials and with websites trying to raises awareness for the condition and that there are approved treatments. They also have been funding education programs to connect rheumatologists, who know all about fibromyalgia, with many primary care doctors who don’t. And they are funding patient education in partnership with groups like the National Fibromyalgia Association, founded by a patient and an organization that has cried out for awareness and effective treatments for years.

Is this public and medical education effort a bad thing?

Some media reports suggest it is: getting doctors and the public in a tizzy about a phony or overused diagnosis fueled by greedy drug companies who want to make billions. Oh please! While one could argue such important issues should be debated, I think we should focus on how to help give suffering patients relief from their pain and celebrate that private industry has made huge investments to meet the need.

Do we need to sort out exactly who needs these treatments and who could benefit in other ways? Sure. But to cast the same old aspersions on the drug companies is unfair and if we keep skewering them one day we can kiss drug development goodbye. The next time you swallow a pill that helps, you ask yourself what the world would be like if no one invented or marketed products like that.

 

FIBROMYALGIA Painfully Real 

Frederic Porcase Physician,

Jacksonville USA

 

Monday’s article demeans all of us with fibromyalgia.

The horrible part was the “Mind over Matter?” stating, “Patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia are more likely to have a history of mental illness, be overweight and economically disadvantaged. Some doctors say their suffering may stem from difficult circumstances rather than disease.”

I run a support group for people with fibromyalgia, and that is not the case. We are all type “A” personalities who have been forced to change our lives due to this horrible disease/syndrome.

All of us would give up our “great” disability funds for the more profitable lives we were living before the chronic pain and fatigue. We may be overweight now, due to not being able to exercise, but this was not the case before the chronic pain and fatigue started not after the diagnosis.

We all had the symptoms years before we actually got a diagnosis. No, we are not hypochondriacs. Fibromyalgia is an invisible disease. Thank goodness we don not look as bad as we feel. Walk in our shoes just one day and then say we have a mental disorder.

Courtesy Opinion.jacksonville/com

http://jacksonville.com/opinion/letters_from_readers/2009-02-11/story/letters_from_readers

 

Utterly real

Letters Published: Tue, Feb. 10, 2009 

Taryn Oesch – Raleigh USA

 

I was diagnosed with fibromyalgia when I was 13 by a Duke rheumatologist. It was a struggle to get back to feeling healthy, but it was a relief to know that I wasn’t imagining my achiness and debilitating fatigue. I have always considered myself fortunate to live in a time when fibromyalgia is considered a real syndrome.

The Feb. 9 Associated Press article “Help or hype? Drug makers fibromyalgia grants raise questions,” however, made me realize we still have a way to go.

Apparently, there are still those who would question the diagnosis, despite the fact that it has helped many people. It disturbed me especially that the article seemed to sympathize with the skeptics. Having a complaint of “I’m very tired” is hard enough to try to explain to professors or employers. 

The only press those of us with fibromyalgia need is press that makes everyone more aware that yes, fibromyalgia is real and yes, its diagnosis is backed by medical research.

 

 

Courtesy The News&Observer

http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/letters/story/1401086.html

READERS: If you are writing to the Editor of Associated Press or the Business Writer Matthew Perrone, please send a copy of the email to me. I am interested and would like to publish your comments. Thanks. Please write to fmsglobalnews@me.com.Jeanne 

 

 

 

EUROPEAN NETWORK of FIBROMYALGIA ASSOCIATIONS

From the News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton

PRESS RELEASE -28.01.2009

 

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) are to  have a consultation with a delegation from the European Network of Fibromyalgia Associations (ENFA) in an attempt to understand the need for medical treatments for fibromyalgia in Europe.

Brussels – Following an invitation by the EMEA, the European Network of Fibromyalgia Associations (ENFA) has agreed to attend a consultation meeting with EMEA, where ENFA representatives will share their knowledge and experiences related to the disease of Fibromyalgia that some 14 million Europeans are suffering from.  One of the biggest challenges that the patients have been facing is the lack of officially recognized medical treatment options in the European Union whereas there are three drugs in the United States of America approved by the Food and Drug Administration: Cymbalta from Eli Lilly, Lyrica from Pfizer and recently authorised Savella from Forest & Cypress.

 

The European Declaration 69/2008 on Fibromyalgia that has been recently adopted by the European Parliament, symbolizing the awareness raised around Fibromyalgia, calls for actions on specific issues from European Institutions to improve healthcare surrounding the disease, e.g. investment in research and provision of better diagnosis and treatment.  In addition, the European Health Commissioner Ms. Vassiliou’s remarks (E-6262/08EN) on the treatment of Fibromyalgia demonstrates encouraging willingness of the European Commission to address various concerns laid out in the Declaration on Fibromyalgia.

“We hope that this new drive on Fibromyalgia awareness will bring the end to the impasse of medical treatment for Fibromyalgia patients in the EU”, said Mr. Robert Boelhouwer, President of ENFA. 

Fibromyalgia is a complex disease with a variety of symptoms in addition to the defining symptom – chronic widespread pain. It is estimated that 14 million people in Europe suffer from fibromyalgia and the condition is more prevalent with women (87%).  Fibromyalgia imposes large economic burdens on society as well as on affected individuals. The debilitating symptoms often result in lost work days, lost income and disability payments. Due to lack of awareness, on average patients in Europe see 3-4 physicians and take multiple medications over the course of several years before they receive a diagnosis of Fibromyalgia.

Mr. Boelhouwer said, “Increasing awareness of Fibromyalgia among healthcare professionals and patients will bring enormous benefits to patients, healthcare providers and the society in general by managing the burden of the disease.” he continues, “Having this in mind, ENFA welcomes the proactive role that both the European Parliament and the European Commission have taken up in raising the awareness of Fibromyalgia.”

 

 

Contact:  European Network of Fibromyalgia Associations (ENFA)

Mr. Robert Boelhouwer President of ENFA

contact@enfa-europe.eu  - www.enfa-europe.eu

 About ENFA

ENFA is a network of patient association and support groups working in close consultation with the national association in the relevant country. Our joint missions are to conquer the myths and misunderstandings around Fibromyalgia. The network will help collectively push forward the boundaries which currently exist in understanding, experiencing and treatment of Fibromyalgia. Our main goal is to see fibromyalgia receiving the recognition it deserves across Europe as an illness in its own right.

---

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB/application/home.do?language=EN

 

 

Declaration of the European Parliament on fibromyalgia (1.26.2.)

From the News Desk of Jeanne Hambleton 

Bulletin EU 1/2-2009 - Health and consumer protection (2/3) PROVISIONAL VERSION

1.26.2. Declaration of the European Parliament on fibromyalgia.

Adopted by the European Parliament on 13 January. Parliament called on the Council and the Commission to:

develop a Community strategy on fibromyalgia in order to recognise this condition as a disease;
 

help raise awareness of the condition and facilitate access to information for health professionals and patients, by supporting EU and national awareness campaigns;
 

encourage Member States to improve access to diagnosis and treatment;
 

facilitate research on fibromyalgia through the work programmes of the seventh framework programme for research and technological development and future research programmes;
 

facilitate the development of programmes for collecting data on fibromyalgia.